401k and inheritance

Do you have any suggestions For going forward in the process I’m going through with my late brother’s employer regarding his 401k distribution? (I am the Personal Representative). It’s a bit of a read here…thank you.

I was advised by my probate attorney to submit a disclaimer on behalf of my mother (86 yrs old, sick with dementia & Alzheimers; I am her Power of Attorney) who is the beneficiary for the 401k as our father, the designated beneficiary, passed. This was advised to be done to reduce her taxable estate as she lives in a state that imposes an estate tax (father predeceased brother by 9 months). My brother lived in the same state and he left a $2.6 million estate that had state Estate tax due of $152,000.

The concern was that if she passes with her assets, plus the assets she inherited from her son (my brother),
Another large state Estate tax bill will be incurred – literally ‘double taxing’ most of the same money that had been previously taxed at my brother’s Estate.

By disclaiming the 401k benefit, it would then pass to the estate, which directs (through my brother’s Will) that my brothers assets are to go to mom and dad, then myself and our younger brother. I was advised that with a second disclaimer by my mom at the Estate level the 401k could be passed through and rolled over to Inherited IRA’s for the next beneficiaries, my brother and I. This will help accomplish the recommendation to reduce moms taxable estate.

I submitted a specific disclaimer to my brothers employer to disclaim the 401k Plan benefit by mom as beneficiary; When this is done, her disclaimed interest (at the plan level) would pass to the estate. I was advised that my mother would then be the beneficiary to the 401(k) asset at the estate level.

I’ve submitted to my late brother‘s employer, the Company Plan (401k) specific disclaimer and also the Estate level disclaimer. The employer tells me that with the 401k disclaimer, the benefit goes to the Estate, and an Estate cannot open Inherited IRA’s. The Estate would then have to do a lump sum Distribution, incurring a significant tax liability And staying in moms assets. What about the Estate level disclaimer? Is this not a valid option?

Thank you very much for your time.



  • You said that Mom is the beneficiary of Deceased Son’s 401(k), but there’s no contingent beneficiary.  So if Mom disclaims the 401(k), it passes to Deceased Son’s estate.
  • If Mom disclaims her interest in Deceased Son’s estate, it passes to Deceased Son’s siblings.  But they won’t be designated beneficiaries of the 401(k).  They’re correct that Deceased Son’s estate won’t be able to set up an inherited IRA.  Assuming Deceased Son’s died before his required beginning date,  his estate will have to take all of the benefits by the end of the fifth calendar year after Deceased Son’s death.  The plan may require that it be taken in a lump sum.
  • There isn’t that much of a stretch at Mom’s age.  Life expectancy at age 86 is only 7.1 years.  So the disclaimer may make sense.  For it to be a good disclaimer Mom would have to also disclaim any increase in her share of the estate resulting from her initial disclaimer.
  • On the other hand, if having the 401(k) benefits go to Deceased Son’s estate would bunch the income, Mom may want to keep the 401(k) benefits and disclaim other assets if she’s concerned about her state estate tax.
  • If Mom has any retirement benefits of her own, Roth conversions would reduce her state estate tax.  If she’s able to make gifts, or if the power of attorney authorized gifts, that would also reduce her state estate tax.
  • Mom or her agent may want to consult with competent tax/estates counsel to help her decide how best to proceed.
  • Deceased Son should have named additional contingent beneficiaries (his siblings or his nieces and nephews or trusts for their benefit) for his 401(k) benefits who would have taken them upon Mom’s disclaimer.  That would have allowed for the stretch.
  • Bruce Steiner

 



Add new comment

Log in or register to post comments